
Meeting Minutes
Attending: Gary Mendenhall;
Melissa Colon; Ida Ponder; Kelley Marshall; Josh Bigelow; Mike Torok; Marty
Gang; Wendy Link; Brian Greene; Cass Larkin; Robert Gritz; Don Smith; Connie
Mical; Susan Vegter-Slape
Guest: Chris Martin, Chief Technology Officer,
1. Distance Education Update – No report
2. Discuss CC’s technology priorities – to
submit to District IT for inclusion in their strategic planning
YCCD
has asked
Ø
Level 1,
High-Must have
Ø
Level 2,
Medium-Should have
Ø
Level 3, Low-Nice
to have
TECHNOLOGY
7c. Importance: Level 1 (The Director
of Information Technology & Media Services referenced as a key decision-maker
for all campus technology-assisted solutions.)
8. Importance: Level 1 (Increase
wireless infrastructure installation and support across campus to leverage
access in non- traditional areas in support of the enhanced gathering areas listed in the
Campus Master Plan and other areas on campus without access to campus provided
technology.
TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT, UPGRADE
1. Importance: Level 1 (Equipment must be replaced on a regular cycle to
maintain a proper standard level of service to end-users.)
6. Importance: Level 1
(Standardized adoption of accessibility software necessary to ensure compliance
with federal and state regulations.)
7. Importance: Level 1 (Upgrades
and new applications should be evaluated for functionality, system
requirements, investment value, and feasibility of cross-platform operation.)
NETWORK
1. Importance:
Level 1 (The College’s
telecommunications network will continue to support the College’s mission by
providing opportunities for teaching and learning with access to the voice,
video and data network.)
2. Importance: Level 2 (Streaming video is
fast becoming a standard in some industries and our College data and video
network needs to be in place to support such bandwidth intensive applications.)
4. Importance: Level 1
(Enhancement of the wireless pilot project to become a full production system
utilized available to all
faculty, staff, students and guests of Columbia College.)
COMMUNICATION
1. Importance: Level 1 (Columbia College will continue to
participate in district discussions concerning decisions and improvements throughout
the evolution of our email system.)
3. Importance: Level 3 (Investigation and piloting of alternate communication
protocols should be investigated.)
REMOTE ACCESS OF TECHNOLOGY
RESOURCES
1. Importance: Level 2 (Virtual Private Networks (VPN)
connectivity will be maintained and, as appropriate, extended to identified and
trained staff and faculty.)
2. Importance: Level 2 (Investigation into portal technologies to allow for web
access to institutional systems.)
2. Importance: Level 1
(Recognizing that web is an essential 24-hour, seven day-a-week service, the
District must invest in additional backup hardware, software, server security
and staffing to ensure local needs are met in a timely fashion.)
3. Importance: Level 2 (Columbia
should continue to work with the YCCD programmers to customize our program interfaces
to integrate our Web services with our student information system.)
4. Importance: Level 1 (Update site for the use of a content management
system and train faculty and staff on the use of the system for maintenance and
updates.)
BUSINESS CONTINUITY
1c. Importance: Level 2 (Off-site storage of monthly or semi-annual data
should be placed at the YCCD Central Services area and another suitable
off-site location identified.)
2. Importance: Level 1
(Formulation of business continuity requirements for critical business
operation centers … during an emergency or crisis.)
3. Other – CHANGES/REVISIONS NEEDED TO
TECHNOLOGY
The Committee has asked technology consultant, Chris
Martin, to make revisions/additions/deletions to the following items in the
Columbia College Draft Technology Plan, Fall 2007 (
TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT, UPGRADE
7. Add
statement to reflect: Columbia College should provide YCCD with an approved
software/platform list which will include such as SARS, SIRSI, VEMS, etc.
to ensure compatibility.
NETWORK
Add statement to reflect: Within this area, a
statement/clarification should be made regarding CC bandwidth needing to be actively
metric to ensure our needs are met and that expansion is done on a systematic
basis at district level.
DISTANCE EDUCATION
1. Add phrase
relating to support of the Distance Education Plan.
Delete items 2-3-4-5-6
4. Delete
“Omni Update” and “FrontPage” terminology
LIBRARY
Delete items 1-2-5-7-8-11-12-13
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY
1. Change “should” to “will” – revise wording to read
“The College will access and maintain”
3. Delete item
#3 relating to accessible signage
Add: Statement
to reference “District-led initiatives will be followed.”
FACILITIES
Add: Statement
referencing technology surveillance systems referenced in the Security Master
Plan.
NEEDED
ACTION: At Committee’s request, Chris Martin will make the
needed revisions to the Draft Technology Plan (November 24, 2007).
Gary Mendenhall will compile the strategic goals
as discussed and using the newly revised Draft Technology Plan (December 7,
2007), will distill the information down to a concise list.
Gary will forward the list to
4. Next Meeting Date:
5. Future Agenda Items – Not discussed