Technology Committee

Minutes

Thursday, October 5, 2006

Manzanita Conference Room

 

Attending:  Gary Mendenhall (Chair), Wendy Link, Susan Vegter-Slape, Ryan Brady, Don Smith, Ida Ponder, Cass Larkin, Marty Gang, Brian Greene, Kelley Marshall, Robert Gritz, Doris Goldson (Recorder)

 

1.  Instructional Technology (ITC) Report, Ongoing – Melissa Colon

§         Melissa reports ITC will be ordering replacement monitors 

§         Working on feasibility of providing additional electrical outlets in the room 

§         Marty Gang recently reviewed the ITC facility with Melissa

 

2.  Arts and Science Representative

Gary Mendenhall reports Tim Elizondo has volunteered to become a member of the Technology Committee representing the Arts and Sciences Division.

 

3.  Web Focus Group Report, Ongoing – Marty Gang - Tabled to next meeting

         

4.  Computer Plan – Tabled to next meeting

 

5.  Technology Purchase Recommendations, FY06-07

Columbia College has recently received Block Grant money from the District. The Technology Committee needs to determine top needs for technology purchases for 2006-07, which means areas will need to begin considering their technology requests.  An example of a priority need would be for the Technology Committee to determine which computer lab is in line for an upgrade.  The Committee will request a recommendation from Marty related to the Computer Plan, prioritizing some of those future purchases.

 

There was discussion about departments (using various funds) purchasing media and technology-related equipment.  Many of these purchases are not receiving review by the Tech Team (Marty Gang, Fred Grolle, Ryan Brady, Wendy Link).  All technology software, hardware and other equipment purchases must be reviewed (but not approved) by the Tech Team, either formally or informally, before actual purchases take place.  While this is an important procedure, some departments do not comply.  It was discussed that possibly a more formal procedure be put into place campus-wide as this involves each department/area on campus.  Gary will determine if Marty has been given the opportunity to review any of these requests or requisitions.  Gary stated he will forward the VATEA list of technology-related purchases to Technology and Media Services for review.  Additionally, Wendy Link has a concern that equipment purchased using block grant monies/categorical funds is not being made available for campus-wide use.

         

Note:  For additional purchase recommendations, also refer to Agenda Items #6 and #8

 

          NEEDED ACTION:  Marty Gang is requested to bring a recommendation to the next Technology Committee meeting   prioritizing future computer purchases.

          NEEDED ACTION:  Gary will discuss Technology and Media Services review of campus-wide technology-related purchases with Marty.

          NEEDED ACTION:  Gary will forward the VATEA list of technology-related purchases to Technology and Media Services (Tech Team) for review.

 

6.  Wireless Access – Expanding wireless access in classrooms and other areas on campus

The difference between “wireless access” and “mobile labs” was discussed.  It was noted wireless access is currently available for use in the Tamarack, Fir and Manzanita Buildings.  Because more faculty members are using computers in classes and computers are being maximized during instructional hours, further discussion ensued regarding mobile labs. (Battery powered laptops, a cart and connections constitute a mobile lab.  There are approximately 20+ laptops housed on a cart.  The cart contains network, internet and printer access and is powered electrically.)  Mobile labs provide computers in regular (non-computer lab) classrooms and would be available for student use.  Because of the very large size of a mobile lab cart, these will not be able to move from building to building.  Since the cost of a mobile lab is substantial, it was determined a survey would be developed to best determine faculty needs.  The mobile lab may be considered a priority for purchase using FY 06-07 block grant monies.  Gary requested Marty, Ryan and Wendy to articulate a 2-4 question survey in lay terms and submit to Gary for further distribution to faculty.

 

          NEEDED ACTION:  Marty, Ryan and Wendy to develop a survey which will be used to determine faculty needs.                                      

 

 

 

7.  Videoconferencing Issues Update – Tabled to next meeting

Note: Wendy Link was happy to report that Kathy Sullivan’s videoconferenced class (Child Development 23) between Calaveras Center and the Tribal Education Center, located at the Tuolumne Rancheria, operated smoothly.    

 

8.  Assistive Technology Server

Kelley Marshall reports that DSPS needs to purchase a server.  The server will allow the department to install specific programs while links would be placed on various computers to gain access.  The server cost is approximately $4,500.  Originally the server was to be purchased using DSPS funds.  However, this funding has been transferred to another account in order to assist a disabled student.  It is imperative this server be implemented.  A first priority for DSPS is that all Columbia campuses be made ADA compliant.  This goal can be achieved by the purchase of this server.  Gary asked Kelley and Marty to develop a proposal which meets the needs of DSPS and obtain Mario Cordova’s approval.  The proposal will then be submitted to the Technology Committee who will consider the request when determining Block Grant purchase priorities.

 

          NEEDED ACTION:  Kelley Marshall and Marty Gang to develop a proposal, which will require Mario Cordova’s approval, to meet this specific need of DSPS.  Once Mario approves,  proposal is to be submitted to the Technology Committee for further consideration.

 

9.  Electronic signatures/Datatel

Susan Vegter-Slape and Robert Gritz discussed the importance of Columbia College being able to accept electronic signatures.  Electronic signatures are needed for students registering online, money transactions and student records.  Guidelines need to be adopted.  Other schools are using electronic signatures and sending information to Columbia.  The question was asked, “What guidelines do we need to have in place in order to accept electronic signatures from other sources?”  It was determined this was an area requiring further discussion at a YCCD Technology meeting and which required District-wide action.

         

In summarization Don Smith suggested, and the Technology Committee concurred, that we offer the following statement of support:

                  

                   The Columbia College Technology Committee supports any procedure that will

                                                (1) Assist students to streamline the registration process

                                      (2) Make electronic signatures more secure.

 

          NEEDED ACTION:  Gary will request electronic signatures be placed on the next YCCD Technology Agenda.

 

 

10.  Other

      A.  Wendy Link - Wendy Link thanked Marty for suggesting she attend the Web Accessibility Conference in Long Beach September 27-30, 2006.  She also thanked Mario Cordova/DSPS and Gary Mendenhall/TCO for agreeing to fund the conference. While Wendy found it to be an interesting and valuable experience, it was clear to her that much of our website is not accessible and a total redesign will be necessary in the very near future.  There is lots of work to be done.

         

      B.  The Web Focus Group will be meeting in the near future – date and time to be announced.

 

11.  Future agenda items

          ITC Report - Ongoing

          Web Focus Group Report – Ongoing

          Computer Plan – Marty Gang to bring update for review/discussion

          Video Conferencing Issues Update

          Electronic Signatures/Datatel

          Technology Plan Revision    

 

Next Meeting

Marty Gang, Acting Chair

Thursday, October 19, 2006

1:00 – 2:00 pm

Location to be announced